Welcome to the rights and freedoms monitoring blog!
Bienvenue au blog de la veille sur les droits et libertés! ...a joint project of CCLA and Pro Bono Students Canada... un projet de l’association canadienne des libertés civiles et Pro Bono Students Canada...
|
Posted by Mark Donald, August 12th, 2010
Mr. David Lepofsky, the noted lawyer and disability rights activist behind automated announcments for subways stops is now taking aim at the Presto smart card system. The system’s machines give a visual, but no audio indicator of a card’s balance, and Mr. Lepofsky says that the failure to include an audio option contradicts the goals of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and violates human rights obligations.
Presto’s executive director says that a automated-voice feature is not viable, given the hectic nature of turnstiles at the city’s stations:
“It just operationally doesn’t work. You can’t have the gate stopped or the device stopped in the middle of rush hour.”
Presto notes that visually-impaired commuters can check their balances online on by phone, but Lepofsky argues that the disabled should be able to check their balances just like everyone else. Read the story here.
Posted by Mark Donald, August 12th, 2010
An opinion editorial in today’s National Post has called on those behind the online leak of over 90,000 classified NATO documents from the Afghan conflict to be prosecuted for the apparent damage that the leaks have done to coalition intelligence gathering against the Taliban, asserting that:
“Ordinary Afghans are now reluctant to pass on what they know about Taliban plans out of fear that a future Internet posting will make them the targets of brutal Taliban reprisals.”
Posted by Mark Donald, August 12th, 2010
The Globe and Mail gives a profile of the seven jurors who will decide the fate of Guantanamo’s Canadian detainee Omar Khadr. The article also explores the Khadr defence team’s efforts to obtain an unbiased jury panel.
Posted by Mark Donald, August 12th, 2010
The conviction of a man accused of a brutal attack on a patron at a Vancouver bar frequented by members of the gay community has been welcomed as a demonstration for changing attitudes; but also a somber reminder of the danger gays face in Canada’s so-called “gay-bashing capital of Canada”
Shawn Woodward was convicted for an unprovoked assault on Mr. Ritch Downey, which left the victim with permanent brain damage. The defendant’s claim that he acted in self-defence following unwanted advances by Mr. Downey was rejected by the judge. Witnesses describe the altercation as a “sucker punch” by Mr. Wooward, after which he called the victim a “faggot” who deserved what he got.
Community activists characterize the conviction as illustrative of increasing acceptance amongst the Vancouver police force of the city’s gay community. At the same time, observers note the continued prevalence of attacks on gays in the city. The prosecution has not decided whether to ask the judge to call the attack a hate crime – which would bring a harsher sentence. Read the story here.
Posted by Mark Donald, August 10th, 2010
Montreal paper Le Metropole is hot water following a cartoon featuring an exaggerated depiction Hasidic Jew in a taxi that asks if such vehicles may be called “synagogues.”
The cartoon itself is in response to the case of Mr. Arieh Perecowicz, a Montreal taxi driver who was recently fined for filling his cab with a number of items including family photos, and Jewish prayer parchments. Critics have called the depiction of Hasidic Jews offensive, and see the incident as reason to begin a dialogue on anti-semitism.
The newspaper has aggressively addressed the controversy, releasing an apology and considering whether to reprint complaints about the cartoon in an upcoming issue. Read the story here.
Posted by Mark Donald, August 10th, 2010
Nova Scotia’s black community is angered following revelations that vehicle access to a private shortcut was granted only to white families in an area undergoing bridge repair. Officials have called the accusations of racism “misguided.” The clash comes at a time when race-relations are at the fore in the province, following several high-profile incidents in the past several years. Read more here.
Posted by Mark Donald, August 10th, 2010
A leaked internal report suggests that the Montreal police force is engaged in systemic racial profiling. This comes amid rising claims from citizens’ groups based on anecdotal evidence.
Research in the report suggests that black youths in certain Montreal neighbour hoods are being stopped and asked for identification over four times more often than their white counterparts. Police respond that the results of the study are misleading given the limited size of the sample.
Nonetheless, popular outrage is increasing as Montreal prepares to celebrate the two year anniversary of the shooting death of Mr. Freddy Villanueva by a Montreal police officer. Many community activists have also criticized the blunt way in which police tackle crime in minority-neighbourhoods. Read the story here.
Posted by Mark Donald, August 10th, 2010
A court challenge to the UN’s much-criticized anti-terrorist sanctions mechanism is set to go ahead despite the appointment of a Canadian as Ombudsman for the beleaguered committee.
Critics call the move a “face saving effort” for a UN process that has been widely condemned and repudiated by the U.K. and other nations. The suit was launched by the British Colombia Civil Liberties Association, the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group and Mr. Abousfian Abdelrazik, the only Canadian known to be on the UN sanctions list.
The challenge asks the Federal Court of Canada to strike down Canadian regulations implementing the decade-old United Nations Security Council Resolution 1267 on grounds that the listing and appeal processes lack “basic protections of procedural fairness that are fundamental to the rule of law.” Read more here.
Posted by Mark Donald, August 10th, 2010
The defence of Omar Khadr has been dealt a significant blow, with the presiding judge ruling that all statements made by the Canadian terror-suspect are admissible in court, despite Khadr’s contention that they were obtained as the result of abuse. It now falls to the defence to convince jurors that the evidence offered by the prosecution is unreliable. Read the story here.
Posted by Mark Donald, August 9th, 2010
Pretrial hearings have begun in the Omar Khadr case, with the two camps arguing over whether statements given by Khadr while in custody are admissible as evidence. The defence contends that Khadr was abused in custody, making any statements unreliable.
The Toronto-born Khadr is accused of tossing a hand grenade that killed an American soldier in Afghanistan in July 2002. Military commission jurors who will decide Khadr’s fate are expected to be seated Tuesday. Read the story here.
|
Inscrivez-vous - courriel quotidien ou mensuel ebulletin de ACLC
Recent posts, articles récents
|
Recent comments, commentaires récents